Tamil Information Centre
User Name:   
Password:   
  Remember Me  
Sign up  |  Forget password
Home   
Search
    Contact us
Longer wait for SC decision
Published Date: 13/11/2018 (Tuesday)
  • Three-member bench hears cases in a packed courthouse 
  • 11 petitions filed against President’s decision to dissolve Parliament declaring the move “unconstitutional and illegal”
  • AG’s request for more time refused 
  • AG to file his arguments today morning 

Civil society members, activists, and politicians alike sought the intervention of the Supreme Court as their last refuge yesterday, filing 11 fundamental rights petitions claiming President Maithripala Sirisena’s decision to dissolve Parliament was unconstitutional. 

In an unprecedented move, one of the three members of the Election Commission, Dr. Ratnajeevan Hoole, was also among those who petitioned the three-member bench, claiming the move by Sirisena to dissolve Parliament was ex facie illegal, stating that he was duty bound to ensure the Constitution was honoured.

As the country’s political crisis entered yet another new phase, with Sirisena’s sudden move to dissolve Parliament days before his new Prime Minister was to show majority in the House, activists and politicians flocked to the Supreme Court as their last resort. The three-member bench, comprising of Chief Justice Nalin Perera and Justices Prasanna Jayawardane and Priyantha Jayawardane, listened to arguments listed out by petitioners in a courtroom packed to its capacity with lawyers, politicians, and journalists. 

The sense of gravity was almost tangible when the Court decided to hear the cases filed just yesterday morning, taking into consideration the urgency of the matter, despite the Attorney General (AG) claiming that proper notice should be given to the Elections Commission. It was pointed out to the Court that one of the three members of the Elections Commission (EC), Dr. Hoole, was himself a petitioner in the matter, therefore the concern on notice was not valid. 

AG Jayantha Jayasuriya’s request for more time until at least Wednesday was denied by the Bench, which directed him to submit his argument today at 10 am. 

EC Member Dr Hoole, in his petition, sought to clarify the legality of dissolving the Parliament by the President. Dr. Hoole’s Attorney-at-Law Hijaz Hisbullah told Court that his client was “deeply conscious” of the need to maintain a degree of neutrality, due to the position he holds as a member of the Election Commission, but cited Justice Mark Fernando’s 1999 Supreme Court ruling in the Karunatillake Vs. Dayananda Dissanayake case, filed against the indefinite postponement of elections for five provincial councils in August 1998, which held that the Elections Commission should have obtained a judicial order in order to implement election laws. 

Presenting his argument, Hisbullah noted that the proclamation that dissolves Parliament is ex facie illegal, as “there is only one article in the entire Constitution that allows for dissolution of Parliament by proclamation, and that is Article 70 (1).” The counsel noted that the President had avoided complying with that article when he dissolved Parliament.

The lawyer for the EC member said they were arguing “elementary matters of constitutional law”. “If Article 33 (2) can stand alone, when the President is being impeached, for violating the constitution or because he is mentally unfit  - that he may still proceed to dissolve Parliament under 33 (2)?” Hisbullah asked. He also told the Court that honouring the election result was also as important as holding elections and allowing people to exercise their franchise. “At an election all people gather to express an opinion. If we allow the President to dissolve Parliament at any time, it says that the opinion of the President trumps all other opinions. There is one word for that, my lords – dictatorship.”

The counsel for the EC member also noted the urgency of granting interim relief to stay the election, saying the poll would be held at a great cost to the State. “The machinery has already started moving, and preliminary work to hold elections has begun,” he warned, saying the poll should be stayed until the Court concluded determining the matter.

The majority of the counsel presenting before the bench found fault with the President’s use of Article 33 (2), which has been done independent of Article 70 (1), which sets limits on his powers listed in the earlier Article 33 (2). 

The proclamation by the President refers to Article 33 (2) of the Constitution, which gives him general powers to ‘summon, prorogue and dissolve Parliament’, but does not refer to the special provisions set out in the Constitution which set limits on his powers to do so.

Lawyers arguing noted that the provision in Article 33 (2) should be read with the provisions in Article 70, which sets out the framework within which the President’s powers to summon, prorogue and dissolve Parliament can be exercised.

“Article 33 says the President shall hold the Seal of the Republic – that doesn’t mean he can go and place the Seal anywhere he likes. There are special provisions listed in the Constitution setting out the instances in which the Seal may be used. A similar law of interpretation applies to the President’s power to dissolve Parliament,” K. Kanag-Iswaran PC argued for his petitioner, Opposition Leader R. Sampanthan.

M.A. Sumanthiran PC, counsel for petitioner Champika Fernando, also noted that if 70(1) is ignored in this manner, after a new Parliament sits - on January 17, according to the Gazette notification – then, on the very next day, i.e., January 18, Parliament could be dissolved. “What if the President doesn’t like the face of the next Prime Minister or something else? Can that be permitted?”

Attorney General Jayantha Jayasuriya, who was cited in the petitions as representing the President, whose actions were being challenged in all the cases filed yesterday, appealed for more time – at least until Wednesday – to make submissions, but was denied. 

 

Source: Daily FT

Share on Facebook


 Latest 25 News/ பிந்திய 25 செய்திகள்:
LNG power project: German Envoy concerned about contract to China
Published Date: 13/11/2018 (Thursday)
ICJ deeply concerned by President Sirisena’s resolve to resume executions in Sri Lanka
Published Date: 13/11/2018 (Thursday)
Reunion Island deports illegal SL immigrants
Published Date: 13/11/2018 (Thursday)
Long Read: Why has Sri Lanka’s Transitional Justice process failed to deliver?
Published Date: 13/11/2018 (Thursday)
Grandmother whose entire family is settled in UK told to leave country Exclusive: Sixty-three-year-old ordered to return to Sri Lanka and leave behind her partner, children and grandchildren because her recently retired husband ‘doesn’t earn enough’
Published Date: 13/11/2018 (Wednesday)
CaFFE flays prez but its former boss among beneficiaries Six PCs under Governors:
Published Date: 13/11/2018 (Wednesday)
PM moots Truth and Reconciliation Commission
Published Date: 13/11/2018 (Wednesday)
Two individuals behind incidents involving Lasantha, Keith & Prageeth: Gota
Published Date: 13/11/2018 (Wednesday)
PTA to be repealed: Counter Terrorism Bill soon MOVES TO MAKE THE LAW MORE HUMANE
Published Date: 13/11/2018 (Wednesday)
Estate workers to get Rs. 50 more from Govt. for one year: Navin
Published Date: 13/11/2018 (Wednesday)
ADB gives Sri Lanka US$145mn to help breed tech-oriented graduates
Published Date: 13/11/2018 (Wednesday)
Dearth of teachers in rural schools
Published Date: 13/11/2018 (Wednesday)
How can there be freedom without discipline ? - Gotabaya
Published Date: 13/11/2018 (Tuesday)
Lankan delegation holds talks in TN on refugee issue
Published Date: 13/11/2018 (Tuesday)
UK demands full implementation of Geneva Resolutions on Lanka Says US pullout from Geneva body irrelevant
Published Date: 13/11/2018 (Saturday)
Inheritance of a longstanding friendship Work together for a bright future of China-Sri Lanka relations:
Published Date: 13/11/2018 (Friday)
What Sri Lanka Failed To Achieve In Last 71 Years?
Published Date: 13/11/2018 (Thursday)
Tamil Lawyers Forum Urges UNHRC to Refer Sri Lanka to International Criminal Court. Extention of Time will Deny Justice
Published Date: 13/11/2018 (Thursday)
Vavuniya families of disappeared condemn TNA leaders' inaction
Published Date: 13/11/2018 (Wednesday)
Inside Story Of The Election Night Coup Unfolds – A Detailed Version
Published Date: 13/11/2018 (Wednesday)
Conflicts’ resolution is indispensable for durable peace in South Asian region: Pak Envoy
Published Date: 13/11/2018 (Wednesday)
China-Sri Lanka cooperation under Belt and Road brings new opportunities for regional development:
Published Date: 13/11/2018 (Wednesday)
Tragic tale of the Independence Day farce
Published Date: 13/11/2018 (Tuesday)
Disclosing All Details Related To Mawanella Incident Will Help End Disastrous Speculations
Published Date: 13/11/2018 (Tuesday)
The real Kwai killed over 1.50 lakh Tamils Story of enslaved labour in Japanese railway project between 1940 & 1942
Published Date: 13/11/2018 (Tuesday)
Donate
Support our work to bring rights to life in any way big or small
 Amount:

Donate using PayPal

Select dates to view
past and future events
<<<Feb - 2019>>>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
     1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
12
131415
16
17181920212223
24
25262728  
 Stand up for Rights and Justice
Grant 18 year old Saudi Woman Rahaf asylum in the UK
Read more...
Take Action
Call to Ban Monsanto’s pesticide
Trump’s child hostages
Set Noura Free -- sign now!
Latest Publication
Proto Sumero Dravidian: The Common Origin of Sumerian and Dravidian Languages Conference Report:

Proto Sumero Dravidian: The Common Origin of Sumerian and Dravidian Languages

Read more...

Thiruvalluvar
About us
Site Help
Getting in touch
Other
Facebook Youtube twitter
Sitemap  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions
Copyright © 2019 ticonline.org, All rights reserved.